㈠ 介紹一部中國或外國的電影 英語作文
片名(Name) 《外星人ET》
導演(Director) Steven Spielberg
劇情梗概(Main idea) 外星人（ET）誤留在地球上，Elliott把他秘密留在家裡躲避成年人。ET和Elliott成為好朋友，分享痛苦與歡樂，最後幾個孩子准備冒險送ET返回自己的星球。
評價(Comment) 斯皮爾伯格送給孩子和成年人的經典之作；美麗而感人；友誼和愛是人生最重要的。
注意：
1. 影評包括以上表格要點，不要逐條翻譯； 2. 可適當增加細節，以使行文連貫。
3. 參考詞彙：經典之作classic；冒險go on an adventure
ET is Steven Spielberg』s classic for both children and alts. It is about a story that a creature, ET, is mistakenly left behind on the earth and wants to go back to his home. A boy called Elliott, acted by Henry Thomas, hides him in his house to protect ET from the cold world of grown-ups. They become good friends and are so close that they share sorrows and happiness. At last, Elliott and his friends decide to go on an adventure trying to help ET find the way back to his planet.
The film is beautiful and moving. It shows us that friendship and love are the most important things in life.
㈡ 求800字作文 中國電影和外國電影的區別提示有拿兩部電影作對比，看區別，從文化和表達方面入手
在網路文庫里可以查到資料， 就搜」中國電影和外國電影的區別「就行了，第一個是課件，後面有電影的對比分析。（我下面的回答就是摘抄上面的）
中國電影的特點：以社會意識形態內涵為指向，注意教育觀念，具有濃重的本土文化色彩，旨意要求直接而明確。道德倫理傳統也是中國電影表述的重要方面，遵守人倫長情構築情感世界和藉助人倫常情來褒貶判斷，成為中國電影常見的感情支撐點。說到底就是三重，「重道德，重文化，重教育".這跟中國的傳統文化，國情和政府有直接關系。
歐美電影的特點：以個人意識形態內涵為指向，已娛樂性為主的敘事風格。電影的風格注重視覺刺激效果，場面豪華，故事精彩，對話幽默，有時再加上白日夢般的幸福結局或懲惡揚善的道德教育。以高科技，高投入的商業化運作方式，靠娛樂性方面的優勢爭取到了大部分觀眾。導致中國電影和歐美電影最大的根本區別在於中西方的思想常規和文化差異。
㈢ 英語作文 中國電影與好萊塢電影的區別
There are big defferences between films in China and films in Western.Chinese films have a variety of subject themes,stories from history,fron mythes,folkore,legend and so on.Western films tend to be close to everyday life.They have no history,perhaps that is the reason.Not like China,it has thousands of years of history.
The films in China focus on the expression of indivisual one's life,feelings and so on.They usually use a narrative way to show the theme of the films.Western films like to use special effect to catch audiences' eyeball.No doublt Chinese films have deeper meanings in them while the western films only descripe something in shallow.
寫不了更多了
㈣ 為什麼外國電影比本地電影更流行雅思作文
題目：
Nowadays foreign movies are very popular and attract most of people, so that fewer people watch local films. Do you think the government should support local movie instry?
思路：
1. 應該：本土電影是一個國家抵抗當地流行文化入侵的最後征地，因為它能集中反映本土文化元素，如服裝，食物，音樂，宗教儀式等。這些觀影經驗能幫助觀眾恢復對於本土文化的熱愛。
2. 應該：投資本土電影能創造就業。舉例，電影業是一個巨大的商業鏈條，一部電影的啟動能創造數千個職位，關於電影的建築，設計，群眾演員，廣告等。此外，電影拍攝地，如橫店影視城，也常常成為理想的旅遊勝地。
3. 不應該：電影市場是一個自由競爭的世界，遵循自然選擇的原則，好的片子存活，而爛的片子死亡。換句話說，國外影片能被廣泛接受的原因就是它有比本土電影更好的質量。相反，政府的干預只能讓很多本土爛片充斥市場。
範文（Band 9）：
Nowadays, the high popularity of foreign movies in local film market has been a heated issue in debate. Some people suggest the government should intervene in saving local films by supporting the finance and policies. Personally, I partially agree with this view, and my reasons would be explored as below.
Firstly, I believe this assertion is on the wise side, because supporting local films actually serves to preserve local culture. The main worrying aspect of foreign movies, such as Hollywood ones, is that they are culture invaders, which expose local viewers to a global pop culture, from food of MacDonald to rock music, from luxury fashion to famous-brand cars. By watching these movies, local people, especially the young ones, might be misled that the foreign culture has the superiority over the local one. Therefore, there is always a justification for the government to back domestic films which can comprehensively present cores of the local culture like traditional food, clothes, languages, social manners and religions. In this way, the sense of culture identity among local audience will be recovered.
The second reason of approving of such support is that making film itself can provide job opportunities. In fact, the film instry is an extensive business chain, whose running depends on hundreds of constructors, computer designers, actors, advertisers and so forth. That is to say, a small investment from the government in the project of local films can create a large amount of job vacancies for the public. Besides, the practical locations for shooting, like buildings, streets and landscapes, are natural resources attracting visitors, whose inflow would boost local economy.
However, such policy will destroy the fairness of film market. Generally, film market is a world based on the free competition, obeying the principle of natural selection, which popularizes good movies, as well as eliminates bad ones. In other words, the main reason of higher-level acceptance of foreign movies in the public is they have better qualities than local ones. As long as the government intervenes in the market by supporting local films and suppressing international ones, then cinemas are very likely dominated with these low-level and shoddy domestic films. As a result, a whole film market would go into decline, because fewer people have a willing of paying for the junk movies.
In conclusion, I fundamentally supporting local movies by the government is a right decision, for the reason that its benefits in local culture saving and new jobs offering. However, to the extent of local viewers, this decision might violate their rights of enjoying the foreign movies with the best performance in effects or art expression.（436 words）